Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkedGo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:36, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SkedGo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a low profile app development company that has no significant coverage in independent sources other than in a couple of articles about company announcements on business websites. While the app it makes, TripGo, may well meet the GNG, the company itself is unlikely to meet WP:CORPDEPTH and should not have its own article (per WP:INHERITORG and WP:PRODUCT). Kb.au (talk) 04:36, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 04:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 04:39, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If articles like Navit, Mapblast etc. still exist, why delete skedgo? The same criteria should apply to all articles. --PasséVivant (talk) 19:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:WHATABOUTX. Feel free to nominate either of those for deletion if you think they don't meet the notability guidelines. Kb.au (talk) 05:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nominator. Subject is only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 02:42, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't the Research Institutes of Sweden (RISE), the city of Rio de Janeiro, and Gartner (mentioned in the Awards section) trustworthy institutions? --PasséVivant (talk) 20:37, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.