Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skate punk (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Google news gives many hits that appear to establish notability. Consensus also shows keep. Malinaccier (talk) 00:32, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Skate punk[edit]

Delete, I've heard this term before, but don't think it warrants its own article. How is it any different from regular punk music other than a few songs might mention skateboarding? This seems about as notable as terms like orgcore or ramonescore, or other so called subgenres that don't warrant their own pages. Hoponpop69 (talk) 16:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Possible Merge, ~~or delete.~~ This genre does not warrant its own article. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line}_{Review Me!} 16:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears to be a well-established and widely-discussed subgenre. Is mentioned specifically in the Punk rock article and is listed as a subgenre in the {{Punk}} infobox. -- Dominus (talk) 19:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- And, I should add, no legitimate rationale for deletion was advanced by the nominator. -- Dominus (talk) 19:40, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where are you getting that its a widely discussed subgenre? Hardcore or Pop punk are widely discussed subgenres, but skate punk?

Also Wikipedia:Notability (music) does not list criteria for genre, so I'm basing the rational off of Wikipedia:Notability, as it does not seem the article has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.Hoponpop69 (talk) 19:59, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A fair question. I got it from Special:WhatLinksHere/Skate_punk. Many of those links result from its inclusion in {{Punk}}, but many do not. It was clear that hundreds of different Wikipedia articles were discussing or at least mentioning skate punk, so I concluded that it was widely discussed".

However, since you asked, I did a Google News search and found over 1,000 results; scanning the first page suggested that most of these were indeed referring to the musical subgenre and not to skate punks themselves. Top hit is from a 2003 USA Today article; #2 hit from a 2000 Seattle Post-Intelligencer article specifically about the subject. Hit #80 is from a 1995 Rolling Stone article. The phenomenon clearly exists, has done for a significant amount of time, and is widely-recognized.

Now where are you getting that it is not a widely-discussed genre? -- Dominus (talk) 20:21, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I suggest a reading of the discussion in the previous AFD for this article; it may be enlightening. The argument was unanimously in favor of keeping the article, and the nominator withdrew the nomination as an error. -- Dominus (talk) 20:28, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Um I got just 16 news articles when I did a google news search [1].Hoponpop69 (talk) 22:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's 16 articles in the "past month". -- Dominus (talk) 22:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I notice that you neglected to notify The Punk music wikiproject. I have corrected that for you. -- Dominus (talk) 23:31, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It was a well-established genre as far back as the 1980s, and should have an article here.--Michig (talk) 11:31, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article should probably be kept, but I think that the article is small enough that it would do better merged with Punk instead. Just my opinion. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ ^{Drop me a line}_{Review Me!} 15:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Well-established sub-genre. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 18:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Needs work, but history page shows it is being worked by several contributors. A small but real subgenre. To compare this to a single-band genre shows an ignorance of punk history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaohoyt (talk • contribs) 16:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.