Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SixAxis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SixAxis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not think this company meets the notability guideline for companies. A Google search turned up no reliable, independent sources. The in-flight magazine source, upon further review, doesn't actually talk about SixAxis as a whole, just some of their products. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 17:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for not meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. Main source appears to be author's interview with the company's founder. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:14, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.