Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siva Sivani Institute of Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 00:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Siva Sivani Institute of Management[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After observing the article had been flagged for notability concerns, I did a before search & it appears they do not have in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The hurdle is WP:ORG and I don't see any claims in the article, nor do I find any thing that makes it pass it. Jeepday (talk) 18:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.