Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Situs Holdings, LLC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:25, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Situs Holdings, LLC

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For the same reason as last time: a promotional article about an unremarkable company.

The first AfD was closed as "no consensus" because of keep !votes from two editors: Variation 25.2, a sockpuppet of a blocked editor, and Mar11, who has just been blocked and seems to be associated with the same UPE sockfarm. See WP:COIN#Mar11 reviews. – Joe (talk) 16:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 16:14, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 16:14, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. – Joe (talk) 16:14, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging non-blocked participants in the last AfD: @Okamialvis, K.e.coffman, and King of Hearts:. – Joe (talk) 16:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Run of the mill company listing, propped up by warmed-over press releases. --Calton | Talk 16:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree. Got to go the way of the dodo. scope_creep (talk) 17:24, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per SamHolt6. Winner 42 Talk to me! 19:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per SamHolt6. Also the article hit a nerve - they sell "business solutions" Smallbones_(smalltalk) 23:15, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Some of the references are not from reliable sources, but there are enough references from reliable sources, including Reuters and The Wall Street Journal, to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
None of the Reuters or WSJ references meet WP:CORPDEPTH. – Joe (talk) 07:55, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Insufficient evidence of notability, Fails CORPDEPTH. --Guy Macon (talk) 13:34, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.