Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Situation of the Greeks of Imbros and Tenedos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge and redirect to Imbros and Tenedos. D e athphoenix ʕ 14:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Greeks of Imbros and Tenedos[edit]

The article was thoroughly edited and re written by me and improved. I also attempted to wikify it. The article is on a separate subject to Imbros and Tenedos and it would be a shame to merge it, or worse, delete, just because it is on a controversial topic.Citations are available at Talk:The Greeks of Imbros and Tenedos.Globo 11:06, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved article to The Greeks of Imbros and Tenedos Globo 04:02, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be titled to be an inherently POV essay. It is an essay, anyway.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 05:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. Royboy crashfan 06:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Imbros and Tenedos, and clean up for NPOV. Sources can easily be added. Lukas ^(T.|@) 08:51, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Lukas. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 10:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and cleanup as per Lukas. (aeropagitica) 11:29, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete This article was meant to elaborate on the subject of the Greeks of Imbros and Tenedos and only describes factual events, especially Imbros and Tenedos in the light of Treaty of Lausanne and how the treaties terms were later treated. Merging the article is not neccesary as it was meant to be a separate article, elaborating on a subject. Deleting it would be a loss of information, cleaning for structure could be helpful. Citations on the subject are available on Talk:Imbros and Tenedos.Globo 00:07, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Lukas, but wikification & citations will be needed. Carlossuarez46 18:06, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.