Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SiteScout

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 08:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SiteScout

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:What Wikipedia is not and WP:Paid (legal policy), given the history shows a consistent level of activity from SPA author to suggest it's the case; the article contains PR business awards in any publication, including ones where the company can ask for listing (especially one is from a local media) and the sources are clearly labeled announcements, notices, company profiles, company-advertised publishers, funding announcements and columns, press releases, etc. and all unacceptable, and no different than found here. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 21:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 21:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 21:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 21:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The provided coverage is routine: announcements of acquisitions, inclusion in start-up and upcoming company lists, etc. Neither these nor anything that I am finding in my own searches indicates more than a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL company. (Note: an earlier SiteScout, a security firm acquired by Rubicon Project in 2010, appears unrelated.) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. (Possible alternative is redirect to Centro who acquired the firm in late 2013.) AllyD (talk) 07:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just the usual routine announcements. No justification for inclduing the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:15, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indepth sources, GNG. z'L3X1 (distænt write) 01:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.