Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Roger Clifford, 7th Baronet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete & redirect. Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 03:54, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Roger Clifford, 7th Baronet

Reason No events of notability shown - existing and getting married does not pass WP:BIO possible redirect to Clifford Baronets. Vintagekits 14:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:27, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As suggestion by administrators.--Edtropolis 14:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - No notablity / achievements in his own right. Titles to not confer notability. Fails Pokemon test - Tiswas^(t) 16:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete an unsourced WP:BLP about a non-notable guy: notability is not inherited at this low level and his marriage and issue - even his inability to produce a male heir to his title, but there's still time - are not notable. Carlossuarez46 18:33, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
"Delete" Per WP:NOT Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. It is also not a genealogical site or a mirror site for a directory of people in a peerage book. This article does not even reference such a directory. Edison 19:32, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete/Redirect This was really unnecessary as it has already been determined in numerous afds now that Peers, Baronets or any other type of noble who have very little notability except their title should be redirected to the relevant page for that title. Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 02:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Baronets are inherently non-notable, and parasites on democracy -- SockpuppetSamuelson 09:16, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Clifford Baronets unless additional sourced info can be found showing individual notability. Edward321 01:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.