Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sintax

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. The page was speedy deleted by Jimfbleak as unambiguous promotion and a copyright violation. (non-admin closure) Jack Frost (talk) 13:08, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sintax[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Written like an advertisement and fails WP:NBAND. Geschichte (talk) 18:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Band of niche interest. I do not see a breakthrough as of yet. Fails WP:NBAND and the WP:GNG or, with a positive twist, we can call it WP:TOOSOON. Geschichte, thank you for nominating!!! You may want to open your arguments with and focus on the NN claim as this is the important one. Articles can be fixed. For future nominations... gidonb (talk) 13:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Aside from their total unnotability, this is not a Wikipedia article in any way. Wouldn't be surprised if this is copied from somewhere (most likely a festival site or the band's site or something along these lines). COI also applies, as this was the only edit of the creator before he vanished into thin air. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:48, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: G11 / G12. The page is so blatantly promotional because it's copied wholesale from their website; I have tagged it for speedy deletion as a copyright violation. Jack Frost (talk) 10:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.