Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singaporean general election, 2016
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Discussions as to what to call this page can take place on its talkpage. J04n(talk page) 13:30, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Singaporean general election, 2016 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Violates Wikipedia:FUTURE guidelines. No references to substantiate that the general election will be called at that time, or even which political parties will be participating.--Lionratz (talk) 02:41, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because it also concerns an election that has not even been announced:
- Singaporean presidential election, 2017 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Note: Can you please rename back to Next Singaporean general election and Next Singaporean presidential election. There is no fixed-term elections unlike UK. Timothyhouse1 (talk) 14:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It's perfectly reasonable to have an article about the next election, as it's certainly notable and we pretty much know it will happen, even if we don't have an exact date as yet. I believe we have such an article for basically every democracy in the world. Should be moved to Next Singaporean general election or 17th Singaporean general election or something. Other AFDs on similar articles have resulted in no consensus to delete. Grandmartin11 (talk) 17:34, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename (until a date is known) and Keep as above. I believe we generally keep articles for the immediate next election, regardless of whether we know exactly when it will be. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 23:21, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename for General Election page because it can happen at any time. There are many examples of next election pages on Wikipedia. If it's the next immediate general election, I think it's perfectly fine.
- Keep for Presidential Election page because there are very specific rules on when and how the Presidential Election is conducted, under Singaporean law. By that definition, it has to happen in 2017. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 19:51, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 10:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename or Redirect - WP:CRYSTAL/WP:FUTURE, this article is going to be plundered by what if arguments. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 21:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:20, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Remove: Because this page is blank talk as it is hypothetical and we will never know whether the next general election is in 2016. Talking about an election that does not even exist will cause confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.156.106.5 (talk) 15:13, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.