Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinful (El Pecador)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete nancy (talk) 16:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sinful (El Pecador)[edit]
- Sinful (El Pecador) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Clearly a vanity article.
- Also known as Latin hip hop king
This sort of style justifies deletion. ¿SFGiДnts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 01:55, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Absolutely no notability per WP:MUSIC; no coverage in reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 03:25, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the "style" of the article doesn't justify deletion. It certainly needs improvement. I'm neutral for now as to whether or not to delete, but there is some coverage. [1] [2] [3]. Whether or not it's enough to pass notability guidelines is another matter. --BelovedFreak 16:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 16:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 04:05, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.