Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinforosa Amador

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sinforosa Amador

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm scratching my head trying to figure out how this woman "carried to Xalapa the cultural heritage of European Jesuit missionaries" because the article doesn't say, and none of the three references mention her. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. To be kept, this article would need a lot more biographical content and sourcing compared to its genealogical content and even genetic content. (Why does this article discuss the subject's mitochondrial DNA?) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could be wrong, but this looks like an example of someone's genealogical research. Subject sounds as though she could be interesting, but nothing here establishes notability. Apparently she had mDNA. So has every other human being.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 08:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom and above deletes.--Epeefleche (talk) 09:18, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.