Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinead Michael

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Sky Smith. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sinead Michael[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress, All sources in the article are IMDB and BBC episodes, Nothing substantial on Google, Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 20:59, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, fails WP:GNG. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 22:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or redirect The character she played on The Sarah Jane Adventures, Sky Smith, has an extensive article, and it is clear that this is a pretty strong TV role for a child actor. She has additional film credits, and this puts her in better form than the usual child actor articles we see here. {http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2011/09_september/27/sj3.shtml The BBC] has posted her press info, the Doctor Who connection is a pretty strong one. Montanabw^(talk) 03:24, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of that article, I would have absolutely no objections to redirecting there however as it stands this article still fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 03:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I favor at least redirecting, as this will preserve the edit history; this individual may well have a stand-alone article spun out even if this one is not going to make it, no sense deleting the work that went into creating this. Montanabw^(talk) 08:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, Half the time I tend to forget to add the redirect bit above but usually I never have a problem with redirecting these as as you say it preserves the history and can easily be reverted if something substantial pops up :), Anyway thanks –Davey2010^Talk 23:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 22:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.