Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinamalls
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, it's a copyvio and there is a landslide amount of !votes toward deletion. –BuickCenturyDriver 02:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a shopping site, by a new user. Notability anyone? –BuickCenturyDriver 10:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete pure WP:SPAM wording, non-notable per WP:COMPANY, unreferenced. MuffledThud (talk) 10:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete An advertisement, not an encyclopedia article. Warrah (talk) 11:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:WEB and WP:COMPANY. I can't find any reliable secondary coverage. Angryapathy (talk) 14:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as copyvio from their about us page. So tagged. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete -- copyvio, spam, non-notability, no reliable sources. More reasons than I usually see. Accounting4Taste:talk 17:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as in this revision. WP:SPAM and WP:COPYVIO are the case in this one. Ilyushka ☃Talk!Contribs 18:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not seem to be covered in reliable sources. Not the same as Sinamall (mall.sina.com). --Apoc2400 (talk) 00:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.