Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sina Alam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sina Alam[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional UPE article with WP:REFBOMB created by a blocked sock (part of this sock farm) that doesn't look notable, references look very poor, there is even a Google search as reference, it doesn't look like it passes WP:GNG or WP:MUSIC, that award is not a notable or significant thing as well. I see it was deleted from fawiki numerous times as not notable [1] [2] [3] and even salted at some point: [4], so if people who speaks this language natively and who can evaluate the sources better think he's not notable, I think he's not notable. Tehonk (talk) 03:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and Iran. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Per WP:G5. TornadoLGS (talk) 02:11, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.