Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Fraser University's Central Gymnasium (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article's subject is found to not be notable. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Fraser University's Central Gymnasium[edit]

Simon Fraser University's Central Gymnasium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Ostrichyearning (talk) 23:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. There's at least one architecturally significant structure at SFU (the academic quadrangle, used in Battlestar Galactica and at least one SF movie that I vaguely remember) - this isn't anywhere close. Fails WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per failing GNG. Jrcla2 (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Normally I would call for a merge/redirect to the university, but I don't see any usefulness to this as a redirect term and there is no information worth merging. --MelanieN (talk) 23:51, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.