Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simfy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simfy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, no significant coverage by independent sources. It's little bit confusing because it died, then what was left was called Simfy Africa, but now if you Google it, it's completely different, not related to music subscription service. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:44, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Internet, and Software. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 15:44, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:53, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not demonstrate sustained coverage by independent and reliable sources WP:GNG. The available references primarily cover business transactions and partnerships, which do not establish the long-term significance of the company within the industry (WP:CORPDEPTH). The liquidation of the company and the redirection of users to Deezer suggest that Simfy Music's impact was limited and transient. Article also lacks comprehensive coverag that would indicate the service had a significant influence on music streaming or cultural impact (fails WP:SIGCOV)

Cray04 (talk) 05:06, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Non-business transaction non-partnership SIGCOV: [1] Next couple from dewiki: [2] [3] [4] Treating Simfy Africa as the same entity: [5] [6], [7]. Notability is not temporary, and in any case widespread coverage across close to a decade indicates non-transient impact. ~ A412 ^talk! 06:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per A412. I also found [8] by Mybroadband, published 10 days earlier than the one A412 found. Plenty of significant coverage here. Darcyisverycute (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.