Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simba Sleep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that the article has been sufficiently improved Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simba Sleep[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paid article about a non notable organization that doesn’t satisfy WP:ORGCRIT. A review of the sources & even a before search only links majorly to press releases , Pr sponsored posts & user generated sources which are all unreliable as they are not independent of the organization Celestina007 (talk) 20:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 20:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added two more citations from reliable sources to better highlight the innovation and notability of the company. Boxcarboy (talk) 18:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article has more notable sources used, the Guardian for one. Oaktree b (talk) 02:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Oaktree b, one reliable source used does not satisfy WP:ORGCRIT. Celestina007 (talk) 03:38, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, it would perhaps benefit from a Bloomberg search or using SEC filings to establish notability. Somewhat well-known company, but we're missing quite a bit from the article to be able to keep it. Almost there. Oaktree b (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your assistance. The article now includes citations from several reliable sources including the Guardian, the Telegraph, the Times, the Finacial Times and Bloomberg. Boxcarboy (talk) 17:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep with the updated sources, WP:CORP is satisfied --Devokewater (talk) 16:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are enough sources to establish notability. They also used footballer Gareth Bale in their advertising. He is pretty famous footballer and considered Top 10 a few years ago. I know this has nothing to do with the company, but the fact that they hired a celerity is notable. Expertwikiguy (talk) 18:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.