Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sim horse game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Life simulation game. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sim horse game[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can tell, this article has never met basic sourcing requirements. Several sample historical versions all read as WP:OR, and the linkfarm at the end is an added bonus. Guy (Help!) 15:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Life simulation game; not a notable genre in its own right.-- Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 16:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:28, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Life simulation game. Ordinarily I would suggest a merge in a case like this, as the article appears to be about a non-notable sub-genre that could still be worth mentioning. But this article has way too much original research without citations to be a good candidate for merger. Novusuna ^talk 21:16, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.