Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver Strand bikeway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Silver Strand bikeway[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is written like a travel guide (WP:NOTTRAVEL), and I'm wondering whether or not the article is notable. Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 16:16, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - While it's currently rather advert-like, it's received significant coverage from reliable sources, thereby passing WP:GNG.[1][2][3][4] AfD is to brought up when an editor determines that a topic is non-notable, not if they're wondering if it is.--Oakshade (talk) 19:56, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra (talk) 23:13, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets WP:GNG. Source examples include: [5], [6], [7]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:12, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.