Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silly Thing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Silly Thing[edit]

Silly Thing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, no indications of notability, fails GNG -- HighKing++ 11:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - I've a feeling there are Cantonese sources on this, but I'd have no idea how to find them. Article is written as promotional piece. It know that's not a reason for deletion, but there's really nothing here of use to discographer or musicologist. No idea of company history, no idea of artist development. And, of course, no independent sources with which to verify any information. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.