Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silicon Color
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Final Cut Pro. henrik•talk 20:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Silicon Color[edit]
- Silicon Color (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of the article appears to be a non-notable defunct software organization. The subject lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No RS for WP:N. Content could be sumarized in a sentence or two at Final_Cut_Pro#History. --Tgeairn (talk) 05:26, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment there is plenty of mention of this company in Books (eg. [1], [2], [3], [4]). I asked on Portal talk:Apple Inc. for comments here for more insight. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Final Cut Pro Seems worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, but not as a stand-alone article. Perhaps somebody with just a tad of knowledge about Final Cut Pro can work it into that article. Ken Tholke (talk) 01:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.