Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silence the Sirens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Silence the Sirens[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~fails WP:NSONG "Notability aside,~~ Fails WP:NALBUM a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." Flat Out (talk) 23:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It's an album. --Michig (talk) 07:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Appeared on a national chart, passes WP:NALBUMS#2.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - notability isn't enough if the article is a stub and likely to to remain a stub. Flat Out (talk) 05:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – now it becomes a matter of your opinion vs others. You're predicting that this article is "unlikely ever to grow beyond stub". With a review and the charting provided, I'd argue that it is likely to grow to at least Start.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC) Actually it was already assessed as start class (back in 2008). Now its better than it was.08:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - chart placing - David Gerard (talk) 13:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - satisfies WP:NALBUMS. Dan arndt (talk) 14:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.