Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigrid Fry-Revere

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ––FormalDude (talk) 09:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sigrid Fry-Revere

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Law, and Virginia. TJMSmith (talk) 12:24, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seems to meet WP:AUTHOR, at least, with reviews/articles written about her most recent book and already referenced in the article. Additionally I found The ambiguous lessons of the Iranian model of paid living kidney donation Fry-Revere, S. (2014). The kidney sellers: a journey of discovery in Iran. (Durham: Carolina Academic Press), Iranian kidney market in limbo: a commentary on "The ambiguous lessons of the Iranian model of paid living kidney donation". There is also a review of an earlier, bylined two page, book of hers (Accountability of Bioethics Committees and Consultants) in Bioethics: Volume 10, Issue 1 January 1996. And many of the Google Book hits are valid and significant coverage: Moral Conflicts of Organ Retrieval: A Case for Constructive Pluralism: Consider Sigrid's Fry-Revere's comments on dialysis..., The Organ Shortage Crisis in America. Skynxnex (talk) 18:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I would add that her Kidney book has triple-digit holdings in WorldCat and that she has been quoted in articles from CNN, Reason Magazine, etc. 128.252.11.235 (talk) 19:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Skynxnex. Passes WP:AUTHOR, and possibly WP:NACADEMIC and WP:GNG. Sal2100 (talk) 19:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.