Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sigma Omega Nu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If that article is actually created, someone else can redirect this. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:43, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Omega Nu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

sources not notable Cloudentry1992 (talk) 06:25, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 06:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete I would like to keep this article about a 12-chapter Latina sorority, but I could not find any significant coverage at all at Google News Archive, and the references provided at the article are mostly self-referential. Open to a "keep" if better sourcing can be found. --MelanieN (talk) 16:22, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Create, merge, & redirect, although the subject does not appear to pass WP:GNG or WP:ORG with all these AfDs for minority sorority/fraternity organizations it appears to me that perhaps an List article should be created for List of ethnic minority fraternaties and sororities in the United States, and all such organizations that fail independent WP:ORG can have verified content moved to such a list. If any of those organizations later are found to pass WP:ORG or WP:GNG, they can be spunout.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:22, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lonely latina get deletedLuciferWildCat (talk) 21:48, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:23, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking independent sources. If such sources are added tot he article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.