Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidney E. Berger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as unobjected, nac SwisterTwister talk 21:40, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sidney E. Berger[edit]

Sidney E. Berger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet WP:AUTHOR, WP:PROF or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 19:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. seems to be an expert in his field of the history of book paper and bindings. DGG ( talk ) 04:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:15, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Looks like this was created by a Novonium sock and fits their pattern of poorly written biographies of marginally notable people. But I do think this subject is (marginally) notable: his books have been reviewed in RSes [1][2][3] and are widely held in libraries according to WorldCat. – Joe (talk) 09:09, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination per comments above. Thank you, Boleyn (talk) 11:06, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.