Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siddhadata Ashram
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Though this temple probably exists, this article is not verifiable (WP:V), nor notable (WP:N). Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Siddhadata Ashram[edit]
- Siddhadata Ashram (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non notable with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Ism schism (talk) 22:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. — Ism schism (talk) 22:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. — Ism schism (talk) 22:42, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. Also a major part of the article - Gurujee section - has been nominated for speedy deletion by me for copyright violation. --gppande «talk» 09:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've removed the copyvio; speedy deletion doesn't apply to sections of pages, you can just delete them yourself. --Tombomp (talk/contribs) 09:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm almost wanting to say it's spam. Appears to be little more than a promotional piece for a religious group. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 01:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. There are no reliable sources; the buck stops there. JBsupreme (talk) 03:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- weak keep there are reliable sources to verify that the temple exists. Please keep in mind different spellings like Siddh data ashram and Sri Siddhdata Ashram. Laudak (talk) 19:07, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What are we waiting for admins? Please delete --gppande «talk» 08:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.