Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sid Roth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 15:06, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sid Roth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person, no reliable 3rd party references, article appears promotional to sell books and DVD's. 2MPCMOS (talk) 06:49, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

— 2MPCMOS (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Jclemens (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources, non-notable article.--Cox wasan (talk) 09:16, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No high-quality sources that are required to establish notability, mostly using self as his own reference. --Gagg me with ah spoon (talk) 20:27, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.