Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siahi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Siahi

Contested prod about a non-notable band. MER-C 13:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete The article has already been db'd (by me) and prodded, both times the template was removed by the original author. -- Klacquement 13:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn--Jusjih 13:23, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:V. Allow me to explain the reasons. Firstly, in WP:MUSIC, it is stated that the band or individual in question has to release two or more albums to satisy the inclusion of the topic here. However, in the article itself, under the sub-section of discography, the band has only released one album and the other album was only a demo. Moreover, in a google search for the band in question was done, it failed the WP:GOOGLE massively. Although there was about a hundred hits, almost (or all) of the hits were NOT refering to a band at all! Thus, it is also impossible to verify the article as well and even primary sources for the subject in question was impossible to find. To add weight to my argument, the external link of the article sends me to an error page as well! Thus, this article has to be deleted based on the various criterias on this project. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:45, 14 September 2006
• Delete per nom. However, WP:MUSIC does NOT state a band must have two albums, it must satisfy only ONE of the listed requirements. This band, however, appears to satisfy none.66.201.16.35 07:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

  Comment Yes, I am aware of that. My apologies if my above comments did not accurately state this. I should have made my comments clearer. Thank you for emphasizing this here. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 17:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.