Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SiSoftware (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The WP:GHITS "keep" !vote falls flat in light of the scrutiny from the "delete" !votes. ✗plicit 14:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SiSoftware[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not realising WP:GNG policy of Wikipedia. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:39, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 01:39, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A Google News search finds over 8,000 matches on articles containing the term "SiSoftware". Sean Brunnock (talk) 10:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:24, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Software. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:35, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sifting through routine announcements, tech blogs, etc., the available sourcing doesn't meet the WP:NORG standard. It might be possible to craft an article about their product, but not about the company; given the current state of the page one might as well blow it up and start from scratch. XOR'easter (talk) 14:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have to agree with the above, the article needs to be about the Sandra package - there's sufficient NCORP references for that. But there's not sufficient from what I can find to meet NCORP's notability criteria if the subject is the company. This should be TNT'ed. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.