Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SiSoftware
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. needs some work Tone 19:22, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- SiSoftware (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non Notable company - only claim to significance is it's product "Sandra". Codf1977 (talk) 19:53, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 00:41, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Also obvious advertising for yet another business to business back-office tech company: a provider of computer analysis, diagnostic and benchmarking software. The flagship product, known as "SANDRA", was launched in 1997 and has become notably popular in its field..... - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:37, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. SiSoft should be an instantly recognizable name to anyone who has opened a computing magazine at some point during the past decade. The article needs improving. Affinemesh94464 (talk) 08:59, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to SiSoft SANDRA. Their flagship product is notable in fact, however, I don't think the company deserves an article of its own for a single notable product. A redirect to an article on the product seems acceptable, too. Nageh (talk) 13:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 15:00, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup. Their flagship product is a well-known tool used for system diagnostics. Some Wiki Editor (talk) 18:05, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As per Some Wiki Editor. Also 2,070,000 hits on Google. --Rockstonetalk to me! 03:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and flesh out with information about their flagship product "Sandra". Coverage is not particularly in-depth, but is counterbalanced by the breadth. A google book search provides a lot sources that provide small writeups including Leo Laporte declaring it one his favourites. -- Whpq (talk) 19:43, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. For several years Sisoft-Sandra was one of those tools installed on my one or other pc. I don't know if Sisoft or Sandra is more worthy of an article but there is certainly some cultural and historical significance here.Pxtreme75 (talk) 20:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.