Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shut up your mouse, Obama

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shut up your mouse, Obama[edit]

Shut up your mouse, Obama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was turned down for A7 in 2014, on the basis of having enough sources to indicate some significance. What it does not have is any lasting significance, and there not any notability either as an internet meme or as a political comment. DGG ( talk ) 16:11, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as nothing at all convincing for its own notable article, could be moved to a list at best, but there's nothing else to suggest article improvements. SwisterTwister talk 17:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:49, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Possibly Merge to Egyptian presidential election, 2014 in one of the sections -- and remove the quote template and just have the quote as part of the paragraph. Fairly unnotable on its own outside of the election. Probably best fit for websites like "KnowYourMeme". As it happens, it is there already. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article. It lacks any significance outside of the elections. It is more appropriate for Meme sites on the Internet. May be referenced/merged into another relevant article: Egyptian presidential election, 2014. On its own it lacks any worthiness.--Arquenevis (talk) 00:49, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.