Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shusha Prison
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 01:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, tabloid speculation. 24 google hits, 0 google scholar hits. My opinion may be swayed by reliable sources. - FrancisTyers · 14:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless sources can be provided for claims made in article. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of WP:V Ydam 15:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. —Khoikhoi 17:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete unless sourced. --Xyrael T 17:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fad (ix) 00:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hakob 00:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete --Eupator 00:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Guy's do you have trackers, tracking me. :) Fad (ix) 02:06, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if we cannot find any reliable sources. --Starionwolf 03:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete encylopedia articles are written on a variety of important topics, not just stubs which consist of only a few sentences and are sourced by one or two sources. He has other articles which should also be considered too.--MarshallBagramyan 03:10, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - far from there being WP:RS supporting the content, what there is on the general topic of the missing, like this, seems to disagree and put in the same category as most Vietnam MIA theories. An acknowledgement of the issue should be included in Nagorno-Karabakh War and the feeble Amerocentric Missing In Action but that's not a call for a merge. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:29, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.