Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shulamite Ezechi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shulamite Ezechi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is the fourth WP:ADMASQ from Kaizenify we have found thus far, the article is on a non notable individual who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them, The awards they supposedly won all appear non notable or unremarkable. Celestina007 (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:BIO, likely UPE. Part of a number of likely UPE articles by the same certain editor. WP:ADMASQ 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with nom and above. Oaktree b (talk) 20:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not justified as an article; could be either upe or just an honest belief that what is listed in the article is more than trivial PR. DGG ( talk ) 21:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.