Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shukriya Raheel Sharif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 20:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shukriya Raheel Sharif

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be a non-notable social media term. The only coverage I can find is this, which is a news blog; I could find nothing else of substance in English. I had PRODed this, but the tag was removed by the creator. Delete. Vanamonde93 (talk) 21:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches came up with nothing better, not notable. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep / Dont Delete This term is widely used in Pakistan and by Pakistanis. Click Here to see thousands of result for this term in native Urdu Language. Click Here to see result in English. You must also check #ShukriyaRaheelSharif on social media, you may get hundreds of thousands of posts on social media. Please prefer the opinions of Users from Pakistan for this article.Ameen Akbar (talk) 06:31, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It is not enough to show that a term is being used; we need sources about the term. Or to put it differently, you need to show that some reliable sources have substantive coverage, which have not yet done. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep / Don't Delete If we can have articles like A fair day's wage for a fair day's work and Khuy Voyne!, then there is no reason why this article should be deleted. --Muzammil (talk) 16:19, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read WP:OSE. Saying that a certain other article exists is not a reason to keep or delete this one. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - I was only emphasising the notability aspect in the case of these two articles, after all I believe that I am also entitled to express my humble views. --Muzammil (talk) 14:52, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This appears to be little more than propaganda. Bearian (talk) 17:55, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, yes, it's a term with a political dimension, indeed. I'm adding that delsort:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Raheel Sharif. Just as Yes We Can (slogan) redirects to Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008 and little brown saint redirects to Mahatma Gandhi, this slogan should point to the person or movement with which it is associated. Cnilep (talk) 05:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at best as I would've suggested Redirecting as mentioned above, but it's still questionable and also vulnerable to restoring, therefore delete until there's better for a separate article. SwisterTwister talk 06:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pure propaganda, unworthy of a redirect. --MelanieN (talk) 22:18, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.