Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuftipro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Agree that the alternate prior history article would struggle to survive also. Daniel (talk) 07:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shuftipro[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

paid for non notable spam sourced to non-rs and regurgitated press releases masquerading as journalism. CUPIDICAE💕 12:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Looking at the history, it looks like the article was originally for a Canadian landscaping company called The Sod Boys LTD ([1]) before Nic Lizven hijacked it. There seems to be an identical draft version of the article by Nic Lizven here CiphriusKane (talk) 13:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I checked for Swedish sources. The Swedish branch appears to be a small comapany with no media presence. It was founded in late 2019 and there is as yet no yearly report. If it was only a Swedish company I would !vote delete in a second, but branches in other countries might make it notable. The mentions in the sources now in the article are a bit too insignificant to show strong notability. Sjö (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Restore and move to The Sod Boys and reprimand User:Nic Lizven for hijacking an existing article. JIP | Talk 11:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Sod Boys isn't notable either, so I'd nominate that as well. It's pointless. CUPIDICAE💕 14:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I've blocked the creator for spamming. The draft isn't worth saving. MER-C 15:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.