Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shri rani sati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. --George Ho (talk) 16:13, 30 September 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Shri rani sati

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost impossible to understand; the top section seems to be about a fictional story of some kind, whilst the bottom section reads like a travel guide(eg: 'adds to the beauty of the place', 'the building forms are interesting and marvelous'). It also lacks any references. <br\>EDIT:Withdraw Videomaniac29 (talk) 07:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. There seems to be a famous temple of this name but the article is so confused I'm not even sure it's the same one. andy (talk) 18:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but Move to Rani Sati. The article has been re-written from scratch, and hopefully the notability of the subject established. Abecedare (talk) 22:29, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article appears to have been completely rewritten, and all of the problems have been fixed. Videomaniac29 (talk) 23:16, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Videomaniac29, to withdraw say Withdraw at the top of the nomination. I'm guessing that is what you meant with a Keep vote. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 00:38, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note for closing admin: I have gone ahead and moved the page to a correctly spelled title (and excluding the honorific Shri) Rani Sati, assuming that this will be be non-controversial (IAR, if you will). Abecedare (talk) 14:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.