The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
What do you guys think about this one? I think it fails notability and no original research. Theredhouse7 12:17, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable Gillyweed 13:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't look like another Graumann's Chinese to me. BTLizard 14:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and this is one of the relatively few ones here that seem obvious enough to me for a speedy.DGG 00:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
