Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Showcase (Firefox extension)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 23:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Showcase (Firefox extension)[edit]

Showcase (Firefox extension) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSOFT. It says it earned the "Best Use of New Firefox 1.5 Features" award for the Extend Firefox contest, but I don't believe that it merits notability. I couldn't even find the sources which support this claim. Deltaspace42 (talkcontribs) 18:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source: https://blog.mozilla.org/press/2006/03/mozilla-announces-winners-of-extend-firefox-competition/
That contest had a lot of media coverage; that extension also had tens of millions of installs, and was consistently one of the top Firefox extensions. 79.155.41.229 (talk) 22:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Does not meet notability guidelines. Unable to find sources. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.