Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shot Tower Inn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shot Tower Inn[edit]

I had prodded this, and after the prod expired (but before the article was deleted) an IP came along, copied the article's content to Shot Tower (Dubuque), and redirected this page there. Since we don't combine two unrelated topics in the same article merely because of a similarity in name, I have deleted the "merged" text in Shot Tower (Dubuque) and am bringing this here as a contested prod.

This article appears to fail WP:COMPANY for lack of substantive treatment in reliable sources. There are a few Google Books hits in travel guides, but these are simple directory-type listings. Many of the 26 Google News hits are behind paywalls, but none seem to constitute significant coverage that could be used to write an article; the ones that are fully visible are, again, of the travel-guide-listing sort. The Google Web hits seem to be mainly in customer-submitted-review sites and WP mirrors. Deor (talk) 14:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No claim to notability. Quantpole (talk) 14:37, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:49, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 14:49, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Merely unpaid advertising for a business that doesn't seem to be notable. Qqqqqq (talk) 19:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree that this article fails notability.Geoff ^T ^C 15:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm not sure if this qualifies as an ADVERTISEMENT, but nonetheless, it still fails nobility and WP: V. ARTICHOKE-BOY (Talk) 20:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.