Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Short to the point

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (WP:SNOW). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:14, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Short to the point[edit]

Delete. Future film festival, no independent references, notability not established, fails WP:CRYSTAL. WWGB (talk) 11:24, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. —WWGB (talk) 11:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent sources provided or found. Not notable. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failure to abide by WP:CRYSTAL. Article may be of use in future once subject notability has been established wrt wiki standards. Eddie.willers (talk) 14:04, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:35, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice and allow back once the festival actually gains enough independent coverage to pass the inclusion standards. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:56, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even a film festival, just a website calling itself an online film festival, which case it fails WP:WEB too. -Drdisque (talk) 20:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.