Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shoprox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus NCORP not met Nosebagbear (talk) 11:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shoprox[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

De facto unsourced article about a non-notable startup. Fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. Strongly suspect a WP:COI. Kleuske (talk) 08:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Relevant references added Techievena (talk) Techievena
- Are you kidding? You added a reference to a business directory, which does not convey notability. Kleuske (talk) 09:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sorry I am a noob to the platform. Please guide me regarding what classifies as a relevant reference. Techievena (talk) Techievena — Preceding undated comment added 09:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - Then please peruse the above links, which specify the criteria for notability. It is why I linked them. Kleuske (talk) 09:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:03, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:03, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:03, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Clearly not notable. And I agree with the COI suspicion, for what it's worth. Blablubbs|talk 11:18, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Spam and promotional article. No evidence of nobility. Blatant misuse of wikipedia. RationalPuff (talk) 11:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, completely fails NCORP. Govvy (talk) 11:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam article about a company less than 6 months old. Oaktree b (talk) 20:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCORP, I'm unable to find any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Clearly not notable. I don't think the tone is sufficiently promotional for a speedy though. Smartyllama (talk) 18:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.