Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ShopSocially

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ShopSocially

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is thin at best. Most sources are PR pieces or do not bestow notability (e.g., "recognized as a top 10 internet startup" by a non-notable company). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 07:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Nordic Dragon 07:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:03, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, pure promotion, non-notable company. Bishonen | talk 20:04, 5 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as noticeably promotional and simply nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister talk 05:07, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as clearly promotional page which fails WP:GNG. — Omni Flames (talk contribs) 00:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.