Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shivdeep waman lande

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shivdeep waman lande[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS; WP:BIO ZZArch ^{talk to me} 07:04, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Delete -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 17:24, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The article isn't, and based on the sources given can't be, written in a neutral point of view. While it potentially meets the general notability guidelines it is clear that these sources refer to one event which isn't sufficient. --Mrmatiko (talk) 08:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Shivdeep Waman Lande, the subject is notable and has been covered by WP:RS multiple times (and already has an article). — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 12:51, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They are both exactly the same article under two different titles. --Mrmatiko (talk) 13:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's true. So if there is anything salvageable from this article, it can be merged with the more appropriate one. Otherwise, simply redirect. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 15:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article qualifies for a speedy delete under WP:CSD#A10. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 20:32, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.