Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shitball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete for personal attack. Johntex\^talk 02:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shitball[edit]

Vulgar and utterly meritless. BJAODN. AnAn | Talk 00:45, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This nomination was orphaned. bikeable (talk) 01:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No it wasn't. Ashibaka tock 01:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nonsense (could have been speedied as an attack). bikeable (talk) 01:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete rubbish and patent nonsense (agree it meets csd) Digital Thief 01:23, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and do not BJAODN.--Ezeu 01:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unpleasant nonsense, possibly Speedy for personal attack. Blnguyen 01:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the mis-classification as BJOADN. AnAn | Talk 01:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Exists only as an insult. Wisco 01:47, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and do not BJAODN. Inhahe 01:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.