Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirley Strawn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge one; however, not sure about the notability of the Easter Sunrise one. Master of Puppets - Call me MoP! :D 02:22, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Shirley Strawn[edit]
- Shirley Strawn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable diamond searcher. Only claim to notability is discovering the Strawn-Wagner Diamond (of dubious notability), so this is really a WP:ONEEVENT thing. I am also nominating Glenn Worthington for the same reason: notable for finding one diamond (of dubious notability), and his other work (writing a book about diamonds) is not noteworthy.
- Glenn Worthington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) — DroEsperanto (talk) 17:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect both articles to Strawn-wagner diamond/Easter Sunrise Diamond respectively. WP:ONEEVENT says The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person. Neither of these appear to have done anything else note-worthy (for Wikipedia's inclusion criteria anyway) -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 18:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, Worthington found the Easter Sunrise Diamond, a separate diamond from the one Strawn found.— DroEsperanto (talk) 18:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect as per above. The titles are useful as search terms. However, as noted above, they are notable for one event each. The better solution is to put the coverage with the diamonds they found. —C.Fred (talk) 03:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per above. The names are plausible search terms -- Whpq (talk) 16:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.