Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shinkan Co. Ltd.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shinkan Co. Ltd.[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company fails WP:NCORP also undeclared paid editing, sock puppetry and advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 09:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 09:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 09:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 09:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 09:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete refs are either not in depth, or not independent, or 404. Searches on google in English and Japanese did not turn up anything of note (more confident of searching in English than Japanese though). previously went through draftification but the author yanked it back to mainspace. – robertsky (talk) 13:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:29, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article reads like a promotional blurb.TH1980 (talk) 14:43, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 10:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.