Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shining Days

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 10:37, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shining Days

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a valid disambiguation page; only includes Chinese TV shows and episodes which don't have stand-alone pages. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:52, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:DABENTRY says:

"Keep in mind that the primary purpose of the disambiguation page is to help people find the specific article they want quickly and easily."

"Primary" is not "only". This implies other purposes exist for disambiguation pages besides finding other articles. That said, I still linked to articles, even if the TV series do not have articles yet, they are award-winning and their actors do have pages which mention the series. ScratchMarshall (talk) 20:58, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:55, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 15:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 15:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:00, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Disambiguations can have links that are actually redirects to existing articles for valid reasons. An example is Great White (disambiguation). Leo1pard (talk) 05:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:21, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.