Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shihab Thangal Charity Trust

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Let'srun (talk) 00:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shihab Thangal Charity Trust[edit]

Shihab Thangal Charity Trust (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bringing this to AFD as a redirect to Syed Muhammedali Shihab Thangal was objected by the creator. The article fails WP:NONPROFIT. The primary sources include press releases and local coverage about some charity works did by them. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, India, and Kerala. Thilsebatti (talk) 05:13, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I have added translations of the titles of the Malayalam-language newspaper articles used as references. The Hindu is a national newspaper, and there is also international coverage from the Saudi Gazette. I think that the coverage adds up to notability. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 10:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 11:40, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: If 2 reliable sources aren’t enough to establish notability then I don’t know what is. So keep per WP:GNG Nagol0929 (talk) 12:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Yep, looks to meet WP:GNG. Tollens (talk) 06:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.