Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shifty Eyes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shifty Eyes

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a hiphop musician. Sources provided are interview pieces, listing/user generated content. Fails WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV and WP:MUSICBIO. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 08:27, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability through significant coverage not shown. Reywas92^Talk 02:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing here constitutes an WP:NMUSIC pass, and the sourcing is mostly to non-notability-assisting blogs rather than real reliable sources — and the only one that is a valid reliable source, The Source, gives him just a 44-word blurb rather than a substantive piece of coverage, so it doesn't singlehandedly vault him over WP:GNG all by itself as the only non-garbage source in play. Bearcat (talk) 16:54, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, since subject verifiably fails WP:MUSICBIO. -The Gnome (talk) 10:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.